Chris Angstmann, Tim Gebbie · 2026-07-06
A plain-English AI summary of what this paper means for investors — generated on demand from the abstract.
We derive an operational-time variance kernel for a latent-order-book reaction boundary and use it to separate three objects usually collapsed in calendar-time volatility models: a structural boundary cumulant, a clock projection, and a pricing-measure choice. The reaction boundary is the zero of a bid--ask imbalance field. For a locally linear book, signed order-flow perturbations displace this zero through a damped Abel response kernel, so the variance of boundary increments is obtained as a finite-scale Green-function cumulant rather than introduced as a primitive diffusion coefficient. For long-memory forcing with exponent $0<γ<1$, the operational variance has a closed asymptotic form involving effective signed-forcing intensity, liquidity slope, resilience, memory, and operational coarse-graining scale. A deterministic activity clock gives the benchmark local-volatility projection. More general, non-unique clocks generate candidate calendar-time pricing systems. We argue that such projections are admissible only when the induced forward density operator and backward valuation operator remain adjoint on the same state space. Adjoint consistency is therefore a reality constraint on operational-to-calendar time projection: it disciplines non-unique time and identifies where incompleteness enters.
Go deeper: a full research-committee breakdown of this paper, its assumptions and failure modes, and how its method would apply to a specific ticker or your watchlist. See StockTools AI →
AI summary generated from the paper’s public abstract via arXiv; it may miss nuance — read the source before relying on it. Thank you to arXiv for its open-access interoperability; StockTools is not affiliated with arXiv, and all rights remain with the authors. Educational only, not financial advice.